Posts
So last year I did a documentary with the boy on being a sex worker in a relationship- an issue a lot of people are curious about but one that rarely gets addressed. And last night I finally got to see it, on Youtube. The group who did the documentary have been pretty shit about getting me a copy, and having seen it, I think I know why now. (I'm in part 3)
Now, take a wild guess as to my issues about this.
"How would a mother feel?" (don't you mean YOUR mother?)
"Glamorous lifestyles" (did they meet me? like, for realz)
The idea that all sex work is equal (obviously, some have more agency than others)
etc etc etc. You read my blog, you know what I'll say.
::sigh::
It's not terrible, mind. It's just editing that's very silencing, and ends up painting an inaccurate, non-holistic view of sex work. Not only that, but it paints me as being very casual and la-de-dah about sex work, ignoring the risks and issues and how it's hard sometimes, in a casual way that I'm just not. And that's frustrating. It just adds to why sex workers feel isolated, and unable or unwilling to talk to the media about their experiences.
Media people- when you do stuff like this, you are ADDING TO THE PROBLEM. You are actively engaging in the oppression of women.You are making the world more dangerous for sex workers. It's dehumanizing, exploitative, and unethical.
And I'm calling you out.
-Britain's Less-Happy-Than-She-Was-Yesterday Hooker.
edit:
Having spoken just now to one of the people involved, she told me that it all got edited beyond their control... which I definitely believe. "I was impressed by your approach throughout this whole process and respect your voice in coming forth to take on big media agendas. I think the fact that you were there to counter the voices was pivotal and even more so, brave." Thank you.
And big media?
Fuck you.
It's time for the Feminist Porn Awards, well, vaguely time. The season for feminist porn, anyway. And what better way to mark it than arguing with idiots on the internet?
“How is say one cunnilingus shot different from another?”
There’s a huge difference in how it’s shot, for a start.
Cunnilingus that’s good for the camera (i.e. focuses on tongue barely touching pink) is very different from cunnilingus done for sexual arousal (and porn directors that focus on female arousal tend to focus on the facial expressions vs the actual act).
Other things you might see more often in porn made for women:
-use of sex toys that are high quality, body safe, and sterile (silicone, metal, glass)
-short fingernails!
-less focus on penetration-sexual contact after orgasm (the “moneyshot” is not the finishing point)
-longer scenes of oral sex on women
-showing and sexualizing the soft penis vs just the hard
-more use of safer sex, sometimes even shown on camera
-different body types/ethnicities on film without that being objectified- so, curvy women, small breasts, butch women, and people of colour, without the title being “Black Beauties” or “Whale Watching”
Other things you don’t see, but that happen behind the scenes:
-contracts that are respected- no bait and switch like you often get in mainstream porn
-performers encouraged to work with people they want to work with and do sexual acts they enjoy on film, vs providing a warm body
-performers having some say in the editing process
That’s just a starting place. Feel free to ask more about it. I’m the founding member of Ladies High Tea and Pornography Society, along with starting a British queer porn collective, so I’m pretty schooled when it comes to feminist and female-gaze pornography and how it differs from male-gaze porn.
And frankly, I’d argue that some of Anna Span’s original work was very much male-gaze porn made by a woman because it failed some of the above points in how it was shot.
I want to like Anna Span. Honest. But when I see a fair few fake tits, only slender bodies, long pointy nails going inside soft pink cunts, titles like "Lez Be Friends", lots of cocksucking and very little pussy eating... well. That just doesn't really fit with the above list, as far as I'm concerned. And honestly while I get the fantasy of "Their Pants Down"- being caught having a wank after ogling a hot woman, and having her "punish" you by using you- I feel like it's pretty fucking obvious this is a man's fantasy that turns sexual harassment into the start of sexyfuntimes- problematic to say the least. "Play the Slut" is about showing your "dirty side" by- what else? Playing with women!
Ugh.
So here's my problem with saying that Anna Span makes feminist porn. She really doesn't. She's a woman making porn, but it's definitely male gaze stuff (at least, it seems that way to me). Compare her work to Madison Young's and you'll see a pretty obvious difference. This is an important differentiation to be made.
Why is this all so important? Well, it's because I don't believe that porn in inherently "wrong" or antifeminist. Porn is sexuality on film. There's a lot of ways that can be made antifeminist, but I don't think it is by nature. However, when you equate women-directed porn that is still very much a product of patriarchal values and markets and CLAIM it's feminist, you ruin it for those who are actually trying to make ethical porn that values equality and diversity.
Today's rant- over.
I'll start this out here-
I hate Twilight. I hate the movies, I hate the books, I hate the fervor. Yes, I've seen the first movie, read some of the books, and I find it all to be kind of awful.
But I love this dildo. This Twilight-inspired, pale, sparkly dildo. It's lovely, even if it's inspired by Twilight.
I bought the Vamp when on a trip to Good Vibes since I wanted a reasonably sized strap on cock to use on the boy, that would also feel really nice when used on me (or another girl- taking applications on that front, btw). I also kind of wanted one that would pass as being my skin tone. The Vamp caught my eye, as the shape was ideal and the size seemed like it would not be terribly intimidating.
And then I saw it was sparkly. And my inner femme lit right up.
I knew that I needed this dildo for my more femme side of strap on play. I mean, I love my Mark for exploring my butch side, but the Vamp is perfect for my inner girly girl. Ok, also my outer girly girl, shut up. ;)
The Vamp is silicone, which is good for sterilization purposes as well as just being a generally nice, non-porous, body-safe material to play with. I tend to boil my toys, but you can also wash with soap and water if using with a fluid-bonded partner... or, top rack of the dishwasher if, like me, you have no shame.
It's quite firm, unlike the Mark- this is stiff, so even though the dimensions aren't huge (1.5 inches in diameter, and about 6.25 inches in length) it feels pretty intense. It has some veins near the head which I found quite nice against my g-spot, but might be too intense for people new to strap on play. You'll probably get that "popping" sensation if you pull out and then push in again- something I love, but not everyone does! Of course, as with anything, use lots of lube (just stay away from silicone lube as it'll destroy the toy!)
I really like the shape and heft of this toy. The boy loved having it in his mouth (no smell and a nice width make it comfortable for him), and I love using it on my own for masturbation purposes. It's firm enough at the base to work well in a harness without slipping through, and it's not so heavy that it droops- it's basically ideal for penetrative play, harness or handheld. You can easily roll a condom on, too, though I don't know if it would be the best for gender play as the colouring is unreal enough to peg as a dildo. Also, it's way too firm to pack away without you looking like you've scoffed a LOT of viagra! Otherwise this is a fantastic all around toy.
Of course, you can make this toy nice and chilly if you really want to go for the undead roleplay, just let it sit in cold water for a bit before use...
Definitely recommended even if, like me, you hate Twilight, for the versatility the Vamp has as a dildo and, well, because it's shiny! Get your hands on one at Good Vibes.
I posted something about Colorado deciding to raise their fines for johns from $75 to $10,000 (to pay for john schools) on my FB page. What's wrong with these schools, you might ask- I mean, they're always touted as places where sex work clients can learn about trafficking, class issues, and prostitutes with drug problems and rethink their purchase of prostitutes. That's good, right?
Well, no. And there's a few reasons why.
First of all, john schools treat sex work clients like they're women-hating assholes:
John "schools" fail to recognize the diversity of sex workers and clients alike. Sex workers are categorically portrayed as victims of exploitation, while clients are categorically treated as psychopathic manipulators out to satisfy their sexual addictions. While both of these stereotypes may be true of specific individuals, they deny the reality that often sex workers and clients are simply engaging in a mutually agreeable act between consenting adults.
-SWAV
Not surprising, as the media often also paints clients as being unattractive, demanding, and misogynistic. I'm asked a lot about my clients, too, and usually the people asking are really concerned for my well-being. Are clients always messed up men?
Well, no, this isn't true in my experience *in places where sex work is legal*- I have never gotten a single call to call me names or treat me poorly since I've been in the UK, and in fact, my clients often apologize for being late, or trying to take advantage by trying to get some dirty texting for free. They treat me with respect, don't try to negotiate very often, and *consider my time as equally valuable to theirs*.
In the US, however, where sex work is illegal, I have had death threats, clients push their luck, and insults thrown at me down the phone or in my inbox. Sometimes it's because of my weight. Sometimes it's because I'm a sex worker. Sometimes it's because I'm a feminist, or queer, or something else entirely. I have had worse luck with time wasters, stinginess with tips, and general disrespect. In California I have had more men try to avoid condom use or manipulate me into unsafe sex professionally than I have anywhere else. And yeah, I think sex work being illegal has something to do with that.
So, ok, there's a fundamental issue with this john school thing- the assumptions around who sex work clients are, why they see sex workers, and how they behave. But there's other issues too. Entrapment is obviously an important one- often times entrapment is a legal way to catch clients, which means that even if someone is purchasing sex work for the first time, they'll get slapped with a fine the same as a regular. I understand that the idea is to prevent people becoming clients... but, when you make something illegal, the only people who will do it are people who don't give a shit about the law- not really a "safe" option. Not only that, but, as this article from the Sex Workers of Vancouver says:
Allowing police forces the power to carry out the full procedure of justice, which is currently reserved for the courts, would set a dangerous precedent. Currently, when someone (usually a police officer) cuts a deal with the police in order to avoid criminal prosecution, it is considered to be an instance of corruption.
I also liked this point:
Speakers at john "school" are typically women with a negative or ambivalent attitude towards johns. This necessarily creates an adversarial atmosphere and discourages johns from voicing their true opinions, or disagreeing with what they're being told. Johns are made to feel that prostitution is a "women's issue" and as such their "teacher" is always right, regardless of whether or not she has anything in common with the sex workers the johns see. Sex workers and their clients would benefit more from john "schools" run by sex workers, who could teach johns how to be more courteous, to tip well, and other ways to improve their chances of getting good service.
On my personal site, I've posted a guide on being a good client which has been great for briefing new clients. Why on earth would you ask someone who isn't a sex worker to talk extensively on the impact clients have on sex workers? And why oh why do people feel they have the right to speak for me, like I'm incapable of advocating my own agency? ARGH.
Anyway. So when I posted about this john school idea in Colorado, an older, probably well-meaning, white cismale (who identifies as a sex healer, btw) posted this:
Honestly ... I am quite sure they don't care where the girls are from .... to them ... it is just a piece of meat they are renting!!
I'm gonna tell you now, on behalf of the clients I've seen and the clients I will see-
They do not treat me like meat.
The way that anti-sex work feminists, politicians, and men who "want what's best" for me treat me is more patriarchal, problematic, and meat-like than the way my clients treat me.
Because my clients LISTEN. My clients give me agency. They respect my choices, and my humanity. They are male and female, able bodied and not, straight, bi, and questioning, kinky and vanilla.
So fuck this john school bullshit. I'm calling it out for what it is- the government standing in the way of women even independently and safely working the one job where they consistently earn more than men. You wanna talk about treating women like crap? Send the anti-sex work activists to school, instead. I could teach them a lot... starting with history.
Usually when I get sex toys to test, I get ones that the store already carries- but once in a while I get to preview something the shop hasn't trotted out yet. Such was the case with the two glass butt plugs I got to review from Blowfish- I found similar styles at Eden Fantasys though.
I really enjoy glass toys. They hold heat or cold really well, they're nice and smooth, and they're non-porous, which makes them safe to share with a partner. Also nice is the ability to boil them to sterilize, or use some sort of toy wipes or cleaner in between uses! They're also nice and heavy, which feels really good inside the body.
So plug 1 was a bit intimidating at first, in spite of it being shorter. The bluntness of the teardrop shape meant that this was a slow and careful insertion- after you get past that widest bit, though, this is a really comfortable plug.
I don't think it would stay in on its own if you were to try to wear it for a while, though, as the cylindric bit is pretty close to the widest part of the teardrop. It's also a bit heavy, so it might drop out!
I found this to be a better plug for self insertion, as it wasn't easy to hold onto the base when your hands are all slippery! I think it'd be too hard to use this on a partner, though it's manageable. I did try using it on the boy but it was short enough that it was really just something I could slip into his ass, not fuck him with. Not a bad thing, just an observation.
I also quite liked using plug 1 vaginally, as I quite enjoy the feeling of something "popping" in and out of me! Because of the shape, this was quite nice to use in my pussy, and I liked how it felt against my g-spot. Obviously, though, be gentle as your pubic bone is right there and you don't want to hit it.
I think plug 1 is about 1 ½” at widest bit, 3 1/2” long in total. I don't have a measuring tape so it's a bit of a guess!
The boy preferred plug 2... possibly because I could use it on him more actively... ;)
Ok, so what's so great about plug 2?
This one is a really pretty colour- I tried to capture it, don't think I could, really, but here's the best I could do. It looks black until you see it in the light, and it's this really deep cobalt blue colour, almost indigo. Lovely!
But that's only one thing of many I liked about this plug, and preferred, really, to plug 1. Plug 1 was nice, but t was hard to handle with a partner, and the blunt teardrop style I find harder to insert than a more graduated shape.
While plug 2 wouldn't be one I would keep in me for an extended period either, I did think it felt much better during penetration- when I used a dildo while plug 2 was in, wow, yum!
Plug, I LOVED the two different sensations- first the droplet, then the sphere. It felt more securely in because of that, and also just felt really nice. Still, gravity will win, so don't go for a walk with this in or it might clatter embarrassingly to the floor!
Plug 2 was about 5" long (4 1/2" insertable length), and around 1 1/2" in diameter at the widest bit. Quite manageable, and easier to use with a partner due to length and ease of movement.
I found plug 2 to be quite fun to use on the boy- I could really get into fucking his ass with it, and the base was easy to grip (pro tip: latex gloves give you a bit of needed friction).I will say, plug 1 was slightly nicer to use vaginally than plug 2, just due to shape. Granted, they're not made for that! It's just an added bonus.
What else could you use these for? Freeze one, and use it instead of an ice cube, perhaps, for non-melty cold fun... otherwise, they're pretty standard butt plugs, though. You could maybe use them as paperweights, but they'd be pretty obvious.
All in all, these toys are quite nice. If you prefer anal play with a partner, I recommend plug 2- if you prefer anal play on your own, or want something you could experiment with vaginally as well, plug 1 is for you. Either way, give glass a try, it's a lot of fun!
Almost every time I see a client who is into kink, they immediately begin the session with an apology.
I'm a big fan of safer sex, and love to experiment with different condoms, gloves, and lubricants. Obviously there's not often a new condom brand to try, so when Sir Richard condoms came into being at Good Vibrations I was excited, hoping for a condom that would blow previous favourites Crowns and Kimonos out of the water.
They definitely do.
I love these condoms. They come in really classy packaging, first of all, which is important. No one likes a crappy looking package. The pattern on these look sharp, and will appeal to men and women alike I think. And hey, for each condom bought, the company donates a condom to a developing country! Pretty sweet. They're latex, so if you have an allergy, steer clear! And of course, no oil-based lubes, or they'll break.
Ok, but really, let's get to the good shit- how well do these fit, and how well do they work? Well, the boy really likes them, which should tell you something. I appreciate that they fit easily and well, since he's a bit thick and I struggle putting some condoms on him. They didn't reduce sensation (we used a drop of Liquid Silk in the tip) and no breakage, which is always good! All around, they did what one wants extra large condoms to do.
There's another couple types of Sir Richard condoms to check out- ultra thin and classic ribbed. All have similar cool packaging, and all mean that while you're having a tumble in the sheets, you're also donating safer sex supplies to developing countries.
I definitely recommend these condoms- they're good value, high quality, and advocate safer sex access for all. How can you get better than that? Order some for yourself at Good Vibrations!
Today is International Women's Day.
Every time I leave London I have to leave the nest I've made into "home" for the trip. Giving up my last place was the hardest I've dealt with in a while, as it had been my home for a long time- the longest time I stayed in one place in more than a year. I had painted the walls, making them really mine in a way I hadn't had in a while. But circumstances combined, and instead of being able to move back as planned, I had to find somewhere new.
Thankfully, I got very lucky and found another East London place- and this one ends up being slightly easier for me to get to the boy's house, along with my KSL duties and other things. I liked it because it was near a canal, and my housemates are absolutely lovely, but I only just got the furniture in to transform it from "place where my stuff is" to "home". Tuesday night I slept alone for the first time in 3 months, surrounded by luggage overflowing with stuff and it was awful. Now everything's put away, tidy. And now I feel... safe again. Settled. For now, sure, but I look around my room and it feels like mine.
Stability is a luxury sorely missed when you live in two different countries. The back and forth may seem fun to those not doing it, but every time you move, you have to restart. You have to rekindle friendships, resume flirtations, redecorate, even rediscover yourself and your place in it all. It can be really overwhelming, but also hugely powerful- I credit my back-and-forth with a lot of self growth and individual confidence. I've learned a lot.
Thanks, readers, for learning along with me.